<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Regal Squareneck Acoustic &#8211; # 4 of 4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kimock.com/kimockskorner/2010/regal-squareneck-acoustic-4-of-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kimock.com/kimockskorner/2010/regal-squareneck-acoustic-4-of-4/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 15:54:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Betsy</title>
		<link>http://kimock.com/kimockskorner/2010/regal-squareneck-acoustic-4-of-4/comment-page-1/#comment-1010</link>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 17:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kimock.com/kimockskorner/2010/regal-squareneck-acoustic-4-of-4/#comment-1010</guid>
		<description>seems like I have to post another comment, ok well I&#039;ll go with it.  I&#039;m canning a peck of pickled peppers today.  Thinking about the hurricane making it&#039;s crazy way up the East Coast wonderingf about the beach on the south shore of massachustts where I grew up and still get to go every year.  Love you Steve, I hope you get this xoxoxoxox Peace On</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>seems like I have to post another comment, ok well I&#8217;ll go with it.  I&#8217;m canning a peck of pickled peppers today.  Thinking about the hurricane making it&#8217;s crazy way up the East Coast wonderingf about the beach on the south shore of massachustts where I grew up and still get to go every year.  Love you Steve, I hope you get this xoxoxoxox Peace On</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Betsy</title>
		<link>http://kimock.com/kimockskorner/2010/regal-squareneck-acoustic-4-of-4/comment-page-1/#comment-1009</link>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 17:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kimock.com/kimockskorner/2010/regal-squareneck-acoustic-4-of-4/#comment-1009</guid>
		<description>WOah.....you are Killling Me !!!  I miss you ..I want to hear more about the HOUse of Ali Akbhar and St. PAtricks Breastplate.  How can we talk more...Much Aloha, Love and Light, Betsy (Praire Grasssssss)p.s Mahalo Plenty and Ohana ( no one left behind)xoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOah&#8230;..you are Killling Me !!!  I miss you ..I want to hear more about the HOUse of Ali Akbhar and St. PAtricks Breastplate.  How can we talk more&#8230;Much Aloha, Love and Light, Betsy (Praire Grasssssss)p.s Mahalo Plenty and Ohana ( no one left behind)xoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://kimock.com/kimockskorner/2010/regal-squareneck-acoustic-4-of-4/comment-page-1/#comment-522</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 18:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kimock.com/kimockskorner/2010/regal-squareneck-acoustic-4-of-4/#comment-522</guid>
		<description>I understand that my perspective as a bass player might be flawed, as the frequency difference from the tonic to its octave is significantly smaller than with treble instruments. Because the frequency difference from one pitch to the next is so small, maybe just intonation and equal temperament are much closer to being the same thing. Still, I feel like if we can understand how to &#039;do it correctly&#039; on one instrument, we should be able to figure it out on the rest.

I did another experiment today where I plugged my fretless bass into a tuner, made sure the string when played open was in tune, and then checked the tuning of each note, meaning each half step up to the octave. Surprisingly each note was perfectly in tune. At the same place, where the end of my finger meets the beginning of the fret line, both my ears and the tuner confirmed that the note was in tune.

You want a tuning system that allows you to play the &#039;correct&#039;, or perfectly tuned note, while giving you freedom to play any of the 12 notes and any combinations thereof.

When we started this conversation you said something like, &quot;Everyone who is worth listening to does it, and people who don&#039;t do it aren&#039;t worth listening to.&quot; I believe referring to the &#039;tuning on the fly&#039; thing, getting around the deficiencies of equal temperament. I have been thinking a lot about this… maybe because I am not yet fully aboard the &#039;anti equal temperament ship&#039; as you are, but I do think that is a really large statement. In saying that, I think you discount a lot of great musicians who may accept the equal temperament system for whatever reason, but still have something valuable to say. This is something we can talk more about, because I think you need to explain in greater detail what you meant by your original statement.

Again, I think this is a complicated issue that will not be understood without due study.

Maybe equal temperament has caught on despite its flaws because it has proven itself useful and user friendly, almost like an automobile or a computer.

By the way… I am a grad student in a  recording arts program. If you are ever in need of free studio time, please hit me up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand that my perspective as a bass player might be flawed, as the frequency difference from the tonic to its octave is significantly smaller than with treble instruments. Because the frequency difference from one pitch to the next is so small, maybe just intonation and equal temperament are much closer to being the same thing. Still, I feel like if we can understand how to &#8216;do it correctly&#8217; on one instrument, we should be able to figure it out on the rest.</p>
<p>I did another experiment today where I plugged my fretless bass into a tuner, made sure the string when played open was in tune, and then checked the tuning of each note, meaning each half step up to the octave. Surprisingly each note was perfectly in tune. At the same place, where the end of my finger meets the beginning of the fret line, both my ears and the tuner confirmed that the note was in tune.</p>
<p>You want a tuning system that allows you to play the &#8216;correct&#8217;, or perfectly tuned note, while giving you freedom to play any of the 12 notes and any combinations thereof.</p>
<p>When we started this conversation you said something like, &#8220;Everyone who is worth listening to does it, and people who don&#8217;t do it aren&#8217;t worth listening to.&#8221; I believe referring to the &#8216;tuning on the fly&#8217; thing, getting around the deficiencies of equal temperament. I have been thinking a lot about this… maybe because I am not yet fully aboard the &#8216;anti equal temperament ship&#8217; as you are, but I do think that is a really large statement. In saying that, I think you discount a lot of great musicians who may accept the equal temperament system for whatever reason, but still have something valuable to say. This is something we can talk more about, because I think you need to explain in greater detail what you meant by your original statement.</p>
<p>Again, I think this is a complicated issue that will not be understood without due study.</p>
<p>Maybe equal temperament has caught on despite its flaws because it has proven itself useful and user friendly, almost like an automobile or a computer.</p>
<p>By the way… I am a grad student in a  recording arts program. If you are ever in need of free studio time, please hit me up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://kimock.com/kimockskorner/2010/regal-squareneck-acoustic-4-of-4/comment-page-1/#comment-520</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 00:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kimock.com/kimockskorner/2010/regal-squareneck-acoustic-4-of-4/#comment-520</guid>
		<description>Hi Steve-o,

Sorry to sound like a broken record, but after a while of not really thinking about it,the intonation thing just popped back in my head. I am thinking about the equal subdivisions of the octave, and how that would compare to a tuning system where all the notes are &#039;as in tune as they can be&#039;.

Are we simply contrasting equal temperment with just intonation, or is there a system other than just intonation where you think there is an &#039;accurate&#039; or &#039;ideal&#039; tuning.

I have been thinking about the contrast between fretless and fretted... When I play fretless bass, I can hear the &#039;correct note, and it is usually right on the line. If I try to ignore the lines, and say starting with a tonic of D and going up the major scale, just trying the play the next interval of the scale the sounds the most &#039;correct&#039;, I will end up playing on the lines. And when I play fretted bass, the whole tuning just sounds that much sharper. So I am confused. Even when I listen to you play your guitar, as you do so well, when you play the fretless jazzmaster type thingy, I can hear what I would call &#039;tuning anomalies&#039; that are not present when you are playing the strat or any of your fretted instruments.

I understand that these perceptions may be just that, due to years of my ears being conditioned on a musical system built around equal temperment. Never the less, I am unable to put this issue to rest.

We need your words of wisdom, Kimock. Lol. Hope all is well.

-Andrew</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Steve-o,</p>
<p>Sorry to sound like a broken record, but after a while of not really thinking about it,the intonation thing just popped back in my head. I am thinking about the equal subdivisions of the octave, and how that would compare to a tuning system where all the notes are &#8216;as in tune as they can be&#8217;.</p>
<p>Are we simply contrasting equal temperment with just intonation, or is there a system other than just intonation where you think there is an &#8216;accurate&#8217; or &#8216;ideal&#8217; tuning.</p>
<p>I have been thinking about the contrast between fretless and fretted&#8230; When I play fretless bass, I can hear the &#8216;correct note, and it is usually right on the line. If I try to ignore the lines, and say starting with a tonic of D and going up the major scale, just trying the play the next interval of the scale the sounds the most &#8216;correct&#8217;, I will end up playing on the lines. And when I play fretted bass, the whole tuning just sounds that much sharper. So I am confused. Even when I listen to you play your guitar, as you do so well, when you play the fretless jazzmaster type thingy, I can hear what I would call &#8216;tuning anomalies&#8217; that are not present when you are playing the strat or any of your fretted instruments.</p>
<p>I understand that these perceptions may be just that, due to years of my ears being conditioned on a musical system built around equal temperment. Never the less, I am unable to put this issue to rest.</p>
<p>We need your words of wisdom, Kimock. Lol. Hope all is well.</p>
<p>-Andrew</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kimock</title>
		<link>http://kimock.com/kimockskorner/2010/regal-squareneck-acoustic-4-of-4/comment-page-1/#comment-466</link>
		<dc:creator>Kimock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 18:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kimock.com/kimockskorner/2010/regal-squareneck-acoustic-4-of-4/#comment-466</guid>
		<description>On the acoustic it&#039;s usually some kind of DADGAD modal type trip, sometimes as low as A for the tonic.The &quot;g string&quot; is where most of the changes take place, it could be as low as unison with the string below or anywhere in between that and the 4th.
I tend to leave the root five root drone on the bottom 3 alone.

On electric for the rock and roll stuff, FCFACF, like E 1/2 step, same as a lot of the David Lindley live electric steel playing. I like that sound!

For the funk/blues sounds I&#039;m partial to E7, BDEG#BE, but I&#039;ve been working on E9 as well, DEF#G#BE.
Mike Neer hipped me to that, he likes it better than E7 and I&#039;m starting to see why. 
E9 is a more versatile tuning in a lot of ways, the E7 is a pretty blunt instrument in comparison but I&#039;m a lot more familiar with E7 and it is a good fit for my slightly raw interpretation of the blues and funk trip.
I&#039;ll need a couple of years with E9 before I can really say, I haven&#039;t even taken it onstage yet, but it&#039;s a very cool and logical tuning with lots of great single note and slant possibilities.

The conventional wisdom seems to be that the tuning itself isn&#039;t as important as how you connect the notes, so whatever floats your boat that you&#039;re willing to spend some time with should work as well as anything else.
I get the impression that that conventional wisdom doesn&#039;t apply so much to the straight triad bottleneck guitar tunings as it does to the more steel guitar specific tunings tho. . .
You just have to try a couple of different tunings and see what grabs your attention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the acoustic it&#8217;s usually some kind of DADGAD modal type trip, sometimes as low as A for the tonic.The &#8220;g string&#8221; is where most of the changes take place, it could be as low as unison with the string below or anywhere in between that and the 4th.<br />
I tend to leave the root five root drone on the bottom 3 alone.</p>
<p>On electric for the rock and roll stuff, FCFACF, like E 1/2 step, same as a lot of the David Lindley live electric steel playing. I like that sound!</p>
<p>For the funk/blues sounds I&#8217;m partial to E7, BDEG#BE, but I&#8217;ve been working on E9 as well, DEF#G#BE.<br />
Mike Neer hipped me to that, he likes it better than E7 and I&#8217;m starting to see why.<br />
E9 is a more versatile tuning in a lot of ways, the E7 is a pretty blunt instrument in comparison but I&#8217;m a lot more familiar with E7 and it is a good fit for my slightly raw interpretation of the blues and funk trip.<br />
I&#8217;ll need a couple of years with E9 before I can really say, I haven&#8217;t even taken it onstage yet, but it&#8217;s a very cool and logical tuning with lots of great single note and slant possibilities.</p>
<p>The conventional wisdom seems to be that the tuning itself isn&#8217;t as important as how you connect the notes, so whatever floats your boat that you&#8217;re willing to spend some time with should work as well as anything else.<br />
I get the impression that that conventional wisdom doesn&#8217;t apply so much to the straight triad bottleneck guitar tunings as it does to the more steel guitar specific tunings tho. . .<br />
You just have to try a couple of different tunings and see what grabs your attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seltz</title>
		<link>http://kimock.com/kimockskorner/2010/regal-squareneck-acoustic-4-of-4/comment-page-1/#comment-465</link>
		<dc:creator>seltz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 06:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kimock.com/kimockskorner/2010/regal-squareneck-acoustic-4-of-4/#comment-465</guid>
		<description>happy new year steve,and 2 all! you&#039;re alive and well here in thailand! lots of your sweet and joyious music blasting out of my home,as the palm trees sway. doing a set of music for friends new years day afternoon. fridays child worked up. rythm uitar wok coming along nicely! just finished listening/watching new years at the gothic dvd. in the mood! peace to all!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>happy new year steve,and 2 all! you&#8217;re alive and well here in thailand! lots of your sweet and joyious music blasting out of my home,as the palm trees sway. doing a set of music for friends new years day afternoon. fridays child worked up. rythm uitar wok coming along nicely! just finished listening/watching new years at the gothic dvd. in the mood! peace to all!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://kimock.com/kimockskorner/2010/regal-squareneck-acoustic-4-of-4/comment-page-1/#comment-456</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2010 16:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kimock.com/kimockskorner/2010/regal-squareneck-acoustic-4-of-4/#comment-456</guid>
		<description>Steve, what tuning/ tunings do you use with lap steel?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, what tuning/ tunings do you use with lap steel?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cliff D</title>
		<link>http://kimock.com/kimockskorner/2010/regal-squareneck-acoustic-4-of-4/comment-page-1/#comment-437</link>
		<dc:creator>Cliff D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 14:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kimock.com/kimockskorner/2010/regal-squareneck-acoustic-4-of-4/#comment-437</guid>
		<description>Looking forward to that Swain</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking forward to that Swain</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swain</title>
		<link>http://kimock.com/kimockskorner/2010/regal-squareneck-acoustic-4-of-4/comment-page-1/#comment-433</link>
		<dc:creator>Swain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 18:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kimock.com/kimockskorner/2010/regal-squareneck-acoustic-4-of-4/#comment-433</guid>
		<description>Hopefully, I&#039;ll be able to share something listenable soon. I&#039;ve been working on the video lessons, and am feeling like there&#039;s some gold I&#039;ve found........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopefully, I&#8217;ll be able to share something listenable soon. I&#8217;ve been working on the video lessons, and am feeling like there&#8217;s some gold I&#8217;ve found&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seltz</title>
		<link>http://kimock.com/kimockskorner/2010/regal-squareneck-acoustic-4-of-4/comment-page-1/#comment-408</link>
		<dc:creator>seltz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 17:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kimock.com/kimockskorner/2010/regal-squareneck-acoustic-4-of-4/#comment-408</guid>
		<description>amazing stuff! like calculus for a first grader! just being a fly on the wall and soaking up what i can. rythm playing coming along. MR.K.,small question on sitting vs. standing while playing. noticed,years ago that you seemed to be 1 of the few to sit while playing electric. i realize you also stand,but seems you liked to sit a lot. i&#039;ve also gone from standing to completly sitting at this point in time.feel more control. any thoughts? also notice you seem to have some &quot;free&quot; time from live playing,next few months,exception,cool thing you&#039;re doing with jorma. anyting going on in the studio?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>amazing stuff! like calculus for a first grader! just being a fly on the wall and soaking up what i can. rythm playing coming along. MR.K.,small question on sitting vs. standing while playing. noticed,years ago that you seemed to be 1 of the few to sit while playing electric. i realize you also stand,but seems you liked to sit a lot. i&#8217;ve also gone from standing to completly sitting at this point in time.feel more control. any thoughts? also notice you seem to have some &#8220;free&#8221; time from live playing,next few months,exception,cool thing you&#8217;re doing with jorma. anyting going on in the studio?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

